Showing posts with label More Gaza War Isreal Palestine Hamas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label More Gaza War Isreal Palestine Hamas. Show all posts

Monday, January 12, 2009

Obama, Bush, Torturous Legacy, Gaza No End In Sight, And Some Thoughts For Those Who Could Not Get Past Last Night’s Post Because It Is Their...


Obama, Bush, Torturous Legacy, Gaza No End In Sight, And Some Thoughts For Those Who Could Not Get Past Last Night’s Post Because It Is Their God Given Right To Judge Others And Bring Them To Their Lord!

 

 

Obama Signals His Reluctance to Look Into Bush Policies

By DAVID JOHNSTON and CHARLIE SAVAGE

Barack Obama indicated that he was unlikely to authorize a broad inquiry into Bush administration programs like domestic eavesdropping.

 

WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama signaled in an interview broadcast Sunday that he was unlikely to authorize a broad inquiry into Bush administration programs like domestic eavesdropping or the treatment of terrorism suspects.

 

But Mr. Obama also said prosecutions would proceed if the Justice Department found evidence that laws had been broken.

 

As a candidate, Mr. Obama broadly condemned some counterterrorism tactics of the Bush administration and its claim that the measures were justified under executive powers. But his administration will face competing demands: pressure from liberals who want wide-ranging criminal investigations, and the need to establish trust among the country’s intelligence agencies. At the Central Intelligence Agency, in particular, many officers flatly oppose any further review and may protest the prospect of a broad inquiry into their past conduct.

 

In the clearest indication so far of his thinking on the issue, Mr. Obama said on the ABC News program “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” that there should be prosecutions if “somebody has blatantly broken the law” but that his legal team was still evaluating interrogation and detention issues and would examine “past practices.”

 

Mr. Obama added that he also had “a belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards.”

 

Obama Thinking About Investigating Bush Administration?
By Satyam Khanna, Think Progress
Obama on appointing special prosecutor to investigate Bush's crimes: "We need to look forward." Read more »

 

Get Out of Jail Free, If the White House Says So
Georgetown University The Hoya - Washington,DC,USA
Bush, however, took flak for commuting the 30-month prison sentence of I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby — Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff — who ...

 

On Not Taking The Kristol Bait
Atlantic Online - USA
Take this nugget of agitprop, when Kristol spins Obama's acknowledgment that until he is fully versed in what the Bush-Cheney administration actually did, ...

 

Camus Cafe Political Coffee House: Report Names 30 Bush Officials ...
By Ed. Dickau 
Cheney didn’t see the financial crisis coming like he couldn’t believe there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The ONLY REAL reason Dick did not see it coming was because that would be like admitting the Bush Administration . ...
Camus Cafe Political Coffee House - http://cafecamuspoliticalcoffeehouse.blogspot.com/

Who Killed The Peace Process?

In this second part to The Real News' interview with Jesse Rissin Rosenfeld, freelance journalist in Israel and the West Bank, the process of peace-talks is discussed. Rosenfeld says that a "simmering intolerance" for the Palestinian Authority has contributed to anger at the Israeli attack on Gaza and may pave the road for a new intifadah. The PA has been engaged in the "peace process" with Israel and its security forces have been aiding the Israeli attempt at stopping Palestinian resistance to the occupation and the attack on Gaza. A resurgence in protests and riots in the West Bank is therefore seen as a revolt against both Israel and the PA. Rosenfeld says this will mean either a defeat for Mahmoud Abbas in the upcoming elections, or a popular revolt, akin to a third Intifadah.

 

The Mark Weaver Show  Terrorist attack on Gaza. Guest Chris Toensing, editor of Middle East Report. NOTE: server problems with two disruptions but show goes three hours. Drag slider through two interuptions, one of ten+ minutes.

 

Civilian casualties escalate in Gaza

Guardian: Wounded Palestinians pour into overrun hospitals on the 10th day of Israel's offensive

 

Battered by Israel, Hamas faces tough choice

By Jeffrey Fleishman and Rushdi Abu Alouf

The militant group appears ready to continue fighting, but for how long and at what cost? And can it accept a cease-fire without winning concessions, such as the end of the 18-month blockade?

 

Israeli offensive presses into Gaza City

By Richard Boudreaux and Rushdi Abu Alouf

In the heaviest fighting since the invasion began, troops and tanks hit the city from three directions. Gaza City is shaken by shelling and helicopter missile fire.

 

Israel warns Gaza residents of 'new phase' of offensive

By Richard Boudreaux and Rushdi Abu Alouf

A senior Hamas commander and seven members of a Palestinian family are killed. Rocket fire wounds three in Israel.

 

The New York TimesWashington Postand the Wall Street Journal's world-wide newsbox lead with news that Israeli soldiers pushed into heavily populated areas of Gaza City Sunday morning. After some heavy fighting with Hamas militants, the Israeli troops pulled back. Everyone says this could have been a trial run for a stronger push into Gaza's urban areas, or it could just be a tactic to apply pressure on Hamas to accept a cease-fire agreement. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said that while "Israel is getting close to achieving the goals it set" inGaza, "patience, determination, and effort are still needed."

 

The LAT declares that the fighting that took place between Israeli forces and Palestinian fighters yesterday "was the heaviest since Israel attacked the Palestinian enclave Dec. 27." The short-lived push into Gaza's urban areas could mark the beginning of a new phase in the conflict, something Israeli officials hinted at when they announced that the military had been sending reserve units into Gaza since Thursday. Thousands of reservists have been summoned and put though a training course on urban combat,notes the WSJ. Early morning wire stories report that Israel bombed the homes of Hamas leaders today as its ground troops continued to move closer to Gaza City's urban center.


The NYT points out that the diplomats believe the next 48 hours "would be crucial" in deciding whether a cease-fire could be reached. The WP and NYT point out that Israeli media are reporting there is disagreement between Olmert, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, and Defense Minister Ehud Barak about how the war should end. Meanwhile, Israeli military officials are growing impatient and want the country's leaders to decide what the next step should be. The WSJ and NYT point out that every day the Israeli troops remain in their current positions outside urban areas, they become more vulnerable to attacks.


The NYT notes that Israeli officials were "all pushing a concerted message" that Hamas leaders are looking to reach a cease-fire. But these claims are dubious at best. In a front-page piece, the LAT says that two weeks after the Israeli incursion began, most think Hamas is "battered but defiant." As the Palestinian death toll quickly approaches 900, many think Hamas can't accept a cease-fire that merely maintains the status quo. If it doesn't gain any concessions from Israel, Hamas is likely to come under intense criticism that all the death and destruction were for nothing. At the same time, letting the conflict drag on for too long could turn more Gazans against Hamas.


In a front-page analysis, the NYT says that officials in Egypt and Jordan are worried that the Gaza incursion could bring an end to the dream of a two-state solution, in which Israel and an independent Palestinian state can live side by side. Egyptian and Jordanian officials fear that they will be forced to open their borders to Palestinians and could become the mediators between Palestinians and Israel. Egypt and Jordan have come under intense criticism from Iran and Syria, as well as countless of citizens in the Arab world, for failing to stand up for the Gazans. Behind the scenes, there's a long-standing power play in the region over influence in the Muslim world that has been accelerated due to the ongoing conflict.

 

Gaza Update: Israel Says No to Restraint
By Siun, Firedoglake
Israeli bombs hit across the Gaza border in Egypt hurting two policemen and two children. There is talk of more injured. Read more »

 

Bush: I Personally Authorized Torture
By Staff, Think Progress
In an interview that aired today on Fox News Sunday, Bush admitted that he personally authorized the torture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Read more »

 

news that you may have missed: Bush says torture still necessary
By THE FUTURE 
President-elect Barack Obama rejects the
 Bush administration's equivocations about waterboarding, however. "Vice President Cheney, I think, continues to defend what he calls extraordinary measures or procedures when it comes to ...
news that you may have missed - http://iamthefuture-period.blogspot.com/

 

WASHINGTON – In a nostalgic final news conference, President George W. Bush defended his record vigorously and at times sentimentally Monday — and admitted mistakes, too, including his optimistic Iraq speech before a giant "Mission Accomplished" banner in 2003.

After starting what he called "the ultimate exit interview" with a lengthy and personalized thank-you to the reporters in the room who have covered him over the eight years of his presidency, Bush showed anger at times when presented with some of the main criticisms of his time in office.

He particularly became indignant when asked about America's bruised image overseas.

"I disagree with this assessment that, you know, that people view America in a dim light," he said.

Bush said he realizes that some issues such as the prison for suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have created controversy at home and around the world. But he defended his actions after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, including approving tough interrogation methods for suspected terrorists and information-gathering efforts at home in the name of protecting the country.

With the Iraq war in its sixth year, he most aggressively defended his decisions on that issue, which will define his presidency like no other. There have been over 4,000 U.S. deaths since the invasion and toppling of Saddam Hussein in 2003.

He said that "not finding weapons of mass destruction was a significant disappointment." The accusation that Saddam had and was pursuing weapons of mass destruction was Bush's main initial justification for going to war.

Bush admitted another miscalculation: Eager to report quick progress after U.S. troops ousted Saddam's government, he claimed less than two months after the war started that "in the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed," a claim made under a "Mission Accomplished" banner that turned out to be wildly optimistic. "Clearly, putting `Mission Accomplished' on an aircraft carrier was a mistake," he said Monday.

He also defended his decision in 2007 to send an additional 30,000 American troops to Iraq to knock down violence levels and stabilize life there.

"The question is, in the long run, will this democracy survive, and that's going to be a question for future presidents," he said.

On another issue destined to figure prominently in his legacy, Bush said he disagrees with those who say thefederal response to Hurricane Katrina was slow.

"Don't tell me the federal response was slow when there were 30,000 people pulled off roofs right after the storm passed. ... Could things been done better? Absolutely. But when I hear people say the federal response was slow, what are they going to say to those chopper drivers or the 30,000 who got pulled off the roof?" he said.

He called President-elect Barack Obama "a smart, engaging person" and said he wishes his successor all the best. He hinted at the enormous responsibility Obama is about to assume, describing what it might feel like on Jan. 20 when, after taking the oath of office, he enters the Oval Office for the first time as president.

"There'll be a moment when the responsibility of the president lands squarely on his shoulders," Bush said.

He gave his view of the most urgent priority facing the incoming president: an attack on the United States. He chose that risk over the dire economic problems now facing the nation.

"I wish that I could report that's not the case, but there's still an enemy out there that would like to inflict damage on America — on Americans."

He said he would ask Congress to release the remaining $350 billion in Wall Street bailout money if Obama so desires. But, he said, Obama hasn't made that request of him yet.

If Bush should make the request of Congress, it would take the burden off Obama's shoulders involving a program that is extraordinarily unpopular with many lawmakers and much of the public.

But, said Bush, "He hasn't asked me to make the request yet and I don't intend to make the request unless he asks me."

The last time the president had taken questions from reporters in a public setting was Dec. 14 in Baghdad, a session that hurtled to the top of the news when Iraqi journalist Muntadhar al-Zeidi threw his shoes at Bush during a question-and-answer session with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Bush's last full-blown, formal news conference was July 15. He refused to hold another during the final months of last year's presidential campaign, concerned that the questions would be mostly related to political events and wanting to stay out of GOP nominee John McCain's spotlight. But even though aides had suggested that would change after the election, Bush still declined to participate in a wide-ranging question-and-answer session until now, just eight days before leaving office.

He has been granting a flurry of legacy-focused interviews as he seeks to shape the view of his presidency on his way out the door.

 

Bush's legacy is partly his father's

By Jill Zuckman

The 43rd president went into office determined to do things differently from the 41st. But he'll be judged by the same standard.

 

 

Chrysler (again) works to design itself a miracle

By Dan Neil

The company has a long history of pulling itself out of deep trouble. This time, it's counting on electric cars to save it. The public will get a good look at Chrysler's electric-car plans today when it reveals two new "production-intent" vehicles at Detroit's North American International Auto Show: a plug-in hybrid version of the Jeep Patriot compact utility, and a pure electric vehicle, called the Circuit, based on the British sports car Lotus Europa

 

Charles Morgan Jr. dies at 78; lawyer challenged racism in the South

By Patricia Sullivan

Charles Morgan Jr., a civil rights lawyer who challenged the racism of his native South and won numerous landmark cases for equal rights before the U.S. Supreme Court, died Thursday at his home in Destin, Fla. He was 78 and had Alzheimer's disease.

 

Sen. George Voinovich, a fiscal conservative, may get behind ...
Even if he decides not to seek re-
election, he has two years left in his term. Meantime the number of Senate GOP moderates willing to cross party lines has grown smaller. Since Democrats still need a few votes from Senate Republicans to ...
Openers - cleveland.com - http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/

 

Voinovich Won't Seek Third Term

COLUMBUS, Ohio — U.S. Sen. George Voinovich announced on Monday that he will not seek re-election in 2010.

"After prayerful consideration and much thought, my wife Janet and I have decided that I will not seek a third term in the United States Senate," Voinovich said in a statement.

Voinovich, 72, entered the U.S. Senate in 1999 after serving eight years as Ohio's governor. For much of the 1980s, he was mayor of Cleveland. In both jobs he was credited with overseeing an improving economy under strict budgets.


Impact Of Voinovich Retirement

 

Ohio’s Voinovich Fourth GOP Senator To Announce Retirement Plans


Behind the lines with the Taliban

By Paul Watson

A Times writer joins Taliban fighters in an especially dangerous part of Afghanistan. The men appear to have no fear of troops, and prove to be gracious hosts.

 

Financial scoundrels have little to fear from the law

By Michael Hiltzik

If experience is any guide, the titans behind the system's meltdown, and the regulators who watched it take shape, won't pay for their irresponsibility.

 

The cost of nuclear security

By Stephen I. Schwartz and Deepti Choubey

It may come as a surprise that the U.S. spends much more on its arsenal than it does on minimizing risk or planning for the consequences of an attack.

 

Richard Dawkins on board with a pro-atheist message

By Henry Chu

'The God Delusion's' author, a backer of a British Humanist Assn. bus ad campaign, talks about the collision of science and religion.

 

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Israeli Ground Troops Invade Gaza To Halt Rockets : WAR IN THE GAZA!


Israeli Ground Troops Invade Gaza To Halt Rockets : WAR IN THE GAZA!

"The action I am taking is no more than a radical measure to hasten the explosion of truth and justice. I have but one passion: to enlighten those who have been kept in the dark, in the name of humanity which has suffered so much and is entitled to happiness. My fiery protest is simply the cry of my very soul. Let them dare, then, to bring me before a court of law and let the enquiry take place in broad daylight!"

- Emile Zola, J'accuse! (1898) –

Email Virginians For Constitutional Government Google Group:

virginians-for-constitutional-government@googlegroups.com

http://www.bringtheguardhome.org/events/national_guard_launch

http://www.bringtheguardhome.org/

When A Government Refuses To Honor Its Constitutions And Laws: Can The People Be Very Far Behind In Taking The Law Into Their Own Hands?

Israeli ground troops invade Gaza to halt rockets

By IBRAHIM BARZAK and JASON KEYSER, Associated Press Writers Ibrahim Barzak And Jason Keyser, Associated Press Writers 36 mins ago

VIDEO HERE:

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip – Thousands of Israeli troops backed by columns of tanks and helicopter gunships launched a ground offensive in Gaza Saturday night, with officials saying they expected a lengthy fight in the densely populated territory after eight days of punishing airstrikes failed to halt militant rocket attacks on Israel.

The incursion set off fierce clashes with Palestinian militants and Gaza's Hamas rulers vowed the coastal strip would be a "graveyard" for Israelis forces.

"This will not be easy and it will not be short," Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on national television about two hours after ground troops moved in.

The night sky over Gaza was lit by the flash of bullets and balls of fire from tank shells. Sounds of explosions were heard across Gaza City, the territory's biggest city, and high-rise buildings shook from the bigger booms.

Troops with camouflage face paint marching single file. As the ground troops moved in, Israel kept pounding Gaza with airstrikes. F-16 warplanes hit three targets within a few minutes, including a main Hamas security compound.

Witnesses in Gaza said that in the first phase, Israeli ground forces had moved several hundred yards inside Gaza. Israeli security officials said initial clashes with militants took place in open fields and soldiers did not immediately move into Gaza's crowded cities, where warfare would likely get much deadlier.

"We have many, many targets," Israeli army spokeswoman Maj. Avital Leibovich told CNN. "To my estimation, it will be a lengthy operation."

Israeli leaders said the operation, meant to quell militant rocket and mortar fire on southern Israel, would not end quickly, but that the objective was not to reoccupy Gaza or topple Hamas. The depth and intensity will depend in part on parallel diplomatic efforts that so far haven't yielded a truce proposal acceptable to Israel, the officials said.

In the airborne phase of Israel's onslaught, militants were not deterred from bombarding southern Israel with more than 400 rockets — including dozens that extended deeper into Israel than ever before. They fired six rockets into Israel in the first few hours after the ground push began, the military said.

One rocket scored a direct hit on a house in the southern city of Ashkelon earlier Saturday and another struck a bomb shelter there, leaving its above-ground entrance scarred by shrapnel and blasting a parked bus.

"I don't want to disillusion anybody and residents of the south will go through difficult days," Barak said. "We do not seek war but we will not abandon our citizens to the ongoing Hamas attacks."

Israel called up tens of thousands of reservists in the event Palestinian militants in the West Bank or Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon decide to exploit the broad offensive in Gaza to launch attacks against Israel on other fronts.

The military said the country's north was on high alert in case Hezbollah guerillas decided to use its vast stockpiles of missiles against Israel. Israel and Hezbollah fought a 34-day war in the summer of 2006.

White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said U.S. officials have been in regular contact with the Israelis as well as officials from countries in the region and Europe.

"We continue to make clear to them our concerns for civilians, as well as the humanitarian situation," Johndroe said.

The U.N. Security Council scheduled emergency consultations Saturday night on the escalation in Gaza. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has urged key world leaders to intensify efforts to achieve an immediate truce including international monitors to enforce a truce and possibly to protect Palestinian civilians.

Israel's bruising air campaign against Gaza over the past eight days began days after a six-month truce expired. Gaza health officials say the air war has killed more than 480 Palestinians in an attempt to halt Hamas rocket attacks that were reaching farther into Israel than ever before. Four Israelis have been killed by rockets.

Israel is taking a risk by wading into intense urban warfare in densely populated Gaza that could exact a much higher toll on both sides and among civilians.

This sort of urban warfare has not gone well in past campaigns where Israel sent ground forces into Arab population centers in the Palestinian territories or in Lebanon wars in 1982 and 2006. Israeli forces have either gotten bogged down or sustained heavy casualties, without quelling violent groups or halting attacks for good.

The decision to expand the operation, while continuing to batter Gaza from the air and sea, was taken after Hamas refused to stop attacking Israel, government officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because discussions leading up to wartime decisions are confidential.

Before the ground incursion began, heavy Israeli artillery fire hit east of Gaza City, in locations where the military said Hamas fighters were deployed. The artillery shells were apparently intended to detonate Hamas explosive devices and mines planted along the border area before troops marched in.

Hamas remained defiant as the ground war began.

"You entered like rats," Hamas spokesman Ismail Radwan told Israeli soldiers in a statement on Hamas' Al Aqsa TV, broadcast shortly after the start of the invasion. "Your entry to Gaza won't be easy. Gaza will be a graveyard for you, God willing," he said.

"Gaza will not be paved with flowers for you. It will be paved with fire and hell," Hamas warned Israeli forces.

A text message sent by Hamas' military wing, Izzedine al-Qassam, said "the Zionists started approaching the trap which our fighters prepared for them." Hamas said it also broadcast a Hebrew message on Israeli military radio frequencies promising to kill and kidnap the Israeli soldiers.

"Be prepared for a unique surprise, you will be either killed or kidnapped and will suffer mental illness from the horrors we will show you," the message said.

Hamas has also threatened to resume suicide attacks inside Israel.

Hamas has long prepared for Israel's invasion, digging tunnels and rigging some areas with explosives. At the start of the offensive, Israeli artillery hit some of the border areas, apparently to detonate hidden explosives.

Before the ground invasion, defense officials said about 10,000 Israeli soldiers had massed along the border in recent days.

Israel initially held off on a ground offensive, apparently in part because of concern about casualties among Israeli troops and because of fears of getting bogged down in Gaza.


Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said his government decided to mount a land operation despite the risk it posed to thousands of soldiers.

An inner Cabinet of top ministers met with leading security officials for four hours Saturday before deciding to authorize the ground invasion.

Olmert told the meeting that Israel's objective was to bring quiet to southern Israel but "we don't want to topple Hamas," a government official quoted the prime minister as saying. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not supposed to share the information.

The immediate aim of the ground operations was to take control of sites militants use as rocket-launching pads, the military said. It said large numbers of troops were taking part but did not give specifics.

Israeli airstrikes intensified just as the ground operation was getting under way, and 28 Palestinians were killed. Palestinian health officials said civilians were among the dead, including a woman, her son and her father who died after a shell hit their house.

One raid hit a mosque in the northern Gaza town of Beit Lahiya, killing 13 people and wounding 33, according to a Palestinian health official. One of the wounded worshippers, Salah Mustafa, told Al-Jazeera TV from a hospital that the mosque was packed.

"It was unbelievably awful," he said, struggling to catch his breath.

It was not immediately clear why the mosque was hit, but Israel has hit other mosques in its air campaign and said they were used for storing weapons.

Israeli artillery joined the battle for the first time earlier on Saturday. Artillery fire is less accurate than attacks from the air using precision-guided munitions, raising the possibility of a higher number of civilian casualties.

An artillery shell hit a house in Beit Lahiya, killing two people and wounding five, said members of the family living there. Ambulances could not immediately reach them because of the resulting fire, they said.

Resident Abed al-Ghoul said the Israeli army called by phone to tell them to leave the house within 15 minutes.

The ground operation sidelined intense international diplomacy to try to reach a truce. French President Nicolas Sarkozy was the visit the region next week, and U.S. President George W. Bush favors an internationally monitored truce.

Israel has already said it wants international monitors. It is unclear whether Hamas would agree to such supervision, which could limit its control of Gaza.

In Hamas' first reaction to the proposal for international monitors, government spokesman Taher Nunu said early Saturday that the group would not allow Israel or the international community to impose any arrangement, though he left the door open to a negotiated solution.

"Anyone who thinks that the change in the Palestinian arena can be achieved through jet fighters' bombs and tanks and without dialogue is mistaken," he said.

Hamas began to emerge as Gaza's main power broker when it won Palestinian parliamentary elections three years ago. It has ruled the impoverished territory of 1.4 million people since seizing control from the rival Fatah forces of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in June 2007.

Israel occupied Gaza for 38 years before pulling out thousands of soldiers in settlers in late 2005. Israel still controls Gaza border crossings.

Mid East Coverage

http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=36&Itemid=74&jumival=11

Israel's 'victories' in Gaza come at a steep price | The Jewish ethical tradition means embracing Palestinians, too.

The ground invasion of Gaza has begun -Take to the streets!

National Emergency Plan of Action

After heavy artillery firing by Israel into Gaza neighborhoods, a massive troop invasion has begun.


The
ANSWER Coalition, Muslim American Society Freedom, Free Palestine Alliance, National Council of Arab Americans, and Al-Awda - International Palestine Right to Return Coalition are calling on people across the country and around the world to take to the streets to show solidarity with the Palestinian people in Gaza and to demand an immediate end to the murderous attacks carried out by the U.S.-backed Israeli military against the people of Gaza.


Emergency Response Protests


There will be demonstrations today (Sat, Jan 3), tomorrow (Sun, Jan 4) and in the early part of next week.
Click here for a list of protests taking place nationally and internationally (updated frequently). Email info@answercoalition.org to add the protest in your city.

Even in Sderot, Israelis Say No to Endless War

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1052036.html

ISRAEL SENDS GROUND TROOPS INTO GAZA Reports from Gaza and Israel: IDF troops kill dozens of Hamas gunmen http://wa-be1.www.haaretz.com/hasen/images/0.gifBy Amos Harel, Yoav Stern and Yanir Yagana, Haaretz Correspondents, and News Agencies http://www.othervoice.org/welcome-eng.htm

Israeli Lawmaker and Conscientious Objector Nephew of Ex-PM Benjamin Netanyahu Denounce Israeli Attack on Gaza Strip

http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3646184,00.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/30/AR2008123002661.html

IN OTHER NEWS AND ON OTHER FRONTS:

War Vet, 50, Stunned By New Deployment

Former Soldier Last Served During 1st Gulf War

Reported by Jeremy Finley

Camus Cafe Political Coffee House: Get Ready To Fight! Congress Is ...
By Ed. Dickau
Posted by
Ed. Dickau at 11:50 AM · Older Post Home. Fair Use Notice: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, ...
Camus Cafe Political Coffee House - http://cafecamuspoliticalcoffeehouse.blogspot.com/

Farewell to Bush and Cheney | Napa Valley Register
Prove it to yourself by googling: When did Bush know the intelligence was wrong. You will find the answer is clear. He knew it before Congress voted and he hid it from them. He is a criminal and should have been impeached just for this. ...
Opinion/editorial from www.napavalley... - http://www.napavalleyregister.com/

Totally Biased News: Impeach Pelosi
By Kyle Sennett
Impeach
Pelosi. Anyone who reads this column regularly knows that my favorite Love To Hate politician is Nancy Pelosi. I believe she is the exact antithesis of what she should be, and what she claims to be. As the first woman to ever be ...
Totally Biased News - http://totallybiasednews.blogspot.com/

For the Supreme Court, Tradition Is on Tap at Inaugural

When John Roberts Jr. told the Senate in 2005 that judges should be like umpires, applying the rules of others, he added a touch of judicial modesty: "Nobody ever went to a ballgame to see the umpire."

On Jan. 20, the same might be said of Roberts himself: None of the millions of people gathering for Barack Obama's historic inauguration will be there to see the chief justice as he administers the oath.

Yet there Roberts will be, continuing a long tradition -- and it is only tradition, not law -- that joins the Supreme Court and the presidency at a crucial time of transition in the nation's life. Justice John Paul Stevens will also be featured as he swears in Joe Biden as vice president moments before Roberts swears in Obama.

For a branch of government that does not get out much, it is also a rare moment of visibility, when the public sees the black-robed enigmas who make up the Supreme Court -- some of them wearing funny black skull caps. More about the caps later, but the inauguration opens a window on how the fates of the two branches are intertwined.

For Obama and Roberts, the juxtaposition is striking. As a senator, Obama voted against Roberts' confirmation, asserting that "he has far more often used his formidable skills on behalf of the strong in opposition to the weak." And Obama stands poised, depending on vacancies, to populate the Supreme Court with colleagues who may cause Roberts grief.

But no one doubts that both men, with a keen sense of history and propriety, will carry out the ceremony with the cordiality that is the coin of the realm in Washington. If Roberts can shake hands with Justices David Souter and Stephen Breyer every day the Court is in session, he can grip and grin with Obama.

But if it turns out to be awkward, it won't be the first time.

The Bible that Obama has chosen for the ceremony was used in 1861 when Chief Justice Roger Taney swore in President Abraham Lincoln. The two men loathed each other, and to some eyewitnesses it showed. Lincoln had attacked Taney's pro-slavery Dred Scott decision during the campaign.

In 1997, Chief Justice William Rehnquist swore in President Bill Clinton for his second term, just days after the justices had taken a private vote on Clinton v. Jones. The decision exposed Clinton to the Paula Jones sexual harassment and civil rights lawsuit during his presidency -- a ruling that triggered a cascade of events that two years later found Rehnquist presiding over Clinton's impeachment trial. Rehnquist offered Clinton an ominous "good luck" after the oath was over, while Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had been more cheery after swearing in Al Gore as vice president. "Every good wish," she whispered.

The two branches were also intertwined in 1973 when Chief Justice Warren Burger swore in President Richard Nixon, who had been re-elected as the Watergate scandal was snowballing. Though neither knew it, 19 months later Burger would author the decision in United States v. Nixon that forced Nixon to turn over Watergate tapes.

Nixon's first inaugural in 1969 was "perhaps the most awkward pairing" of them all, in the view of University of Southern California historian Mary Dudziak. Campaigning on a law-and-order platform, Nixon had railed against Earl Warren's pro-defendant rulings. Warren had announced his retirement, but President Lyndon Johnson's ill-fated nomination of Abe Fortas to replace him left Warren still in office to swear in Nixon.

'SO HELP ME GOD' | THE LINCOLN BIBLE

The Supreme Court and the president have been joined at inaugurals almost from the beginning of the nation. George Washington, who took office before the Supreme Court was in business, was never sworn in by a chief justice but almost all presidents since then have been -- except when an emergency arises.

The first outdoor inauguration, James Monroe's in 1817, took place at the Old Brick Capitol -- the site that became, more than a century later, the home of the Supreme Court.

The last time someone other than the chief justice swore in a president came in 1963 after the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Dallas federal Judge Sarah Hughes, the only woman to swear in a president, was located swiftly after the assassination and agreed to administer the oath to Johnson aboard Air Force One.

Hughes knew the oath from the Constitution itself, but according to an oral history interview she gave at the Johnson library, she impulsively added the phrase "so help me God" to the end -- as many other oath-givers before and since have done.

California lawyer Michael Newdow, whose case challenging the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance went before the Supreme Court, sued in federal court Dec. 30 to enjoin Roberts from adding "so help me God" to the oath for Obama on Jan. 20.

Johnson's 1965 inaugural marked a change in tradition that diminished the Supreme Court's role in the inauguration somewhat. Johnson's wife, Lady Bird, held the Bible during the swearing-in, a job previously reserved for the clerk of the Supreme Court.

C. Elmore Cropley, the Court clerk who held the Bible for President Franklin Roosevelt's third inauguration in 1941, is remembered for a dubious distinction -- he dropped the Bible after the oath was given. A sequence of photos chronicling the mishap, as well as Cropley's self-conscious smile when he recovered, filled a full page of Life magazine the next week.

CAP OFF

The chief justice is not the only member of the Court caught up in inaugural ceremonies. Associate justices often swear in the vice president, though a variety of others, including Senate presidents, House speakers, predecessors, and others have done the honors over the years.

The rest of the Court is also counted among the VIP contingent with the very best seats and access to the ceremonies. The papers of justices are full of memos and invitations spelling out logistical details, as well as invitations to inaugural galas and events. "Justice and Mrs. Blackmun will attend the breakfast, the swearing-in ceremony, and the luncheon (but may cancel themselves out of the swearing-in ceremony if it is terribly cold if that's alright with you)" reports one 1997 memo in the late Justice Harry Blackmun's papers at the Library of Congress.

If you can spot them in the crowd on the inaugural platform, the justices are often animated, like schoolchildren let out to play -- and they are striking with their black robes and black caps.

The mysterious black skullcaps have gone in and out of vogue with the justices since the early 20th century. They are not for inaugurals only -- at least four justices wore them at the laying of the Supreme Court cornerstone in 1932 -- but seem to be deployed mainly during cold weather. Brimless silk or wool skullcaps, often cornered to give them shape, have been occasionally associated with British judicial garb since the 15th century, but the Court curator's office says "there does not appear to be a direct lineage" from Britain to Supreme Court use.

Chief Justice Edward Douglas White wore one when swearing in President Woodrow Wilson in 1913 -- the first time a skullcap was documented in an inaugural photo. Chief Justice William Howard Taft also wore a skullcap during the ceremonies for Presidents Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover. Their heyday came in 1961 for Kennedy's inaugural when seven of the nine justices wore skullcaps. It might have been eight, but a memo reports that Tom Clark's cap was too small. "For the next inauguration get Mr. Justice Clark a size 7 3/8 skullcap," a note suggests.

Memos about skullcaps fill the Blackmun files throughout the 1970s and 1980s, with one even suggesting how they should be doffed and held during the National Anthem. But the caps were not worn widely again until after Rehnquist, a history buff extraordinaire, became chief justice in 1986. Whether Roberts, Rehnquist's successor and former law clerk, carries on the tradition is uncertain. During the last inaugural, two justices -- Breyer and Antonin Scalia -- wore them, while Ginsburg donned a black fur hat and the ailing Rehnquist wore a black golf-style cap.

Six inaugurations earlier, Blackmun seemed immune from the skullcap trend altogether. A December 3, 1980, memo from then-marshal Alfred Wong told the justices "it will be necessary for the Court to be in full formal dress .--- including skull cap, if that is the individual choice. If you are in need of a new cap, please notify this office prior to December 15, including your head size, and we will arrange to have one made."

In the margin Blackmun -- who usually marked up incoming memos extensively -- penciled in only a large question mark. He was not impressed.

Subscribe to Legal Times

Push to impeach Blagojevich picking up steam
San Francisco Chronicle - CA, USA

... and hopes to delay settling the matter until the Illinois Legislature can impeach the governor and allow a new appointment to be made. ...See all stories on this topic

Fair Use Notice: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.